Guide to HMMs

calendar Sep 14, 2025 · 11 min read · introduction HMM regime-detection  ·
Share on: linkedin copy

A Comprehensive Guide to Hidden Markov Models: Uncovering the Unseen

Have you ever tried to guess what’s happening behind the scenes by just looking at the clues? Imagine you have a friend whose mood seems to change randomly. One day they are happy, the next they are sad, and the day after that they are just neutral. You can’t see what’s causing their mood, but you suspect it’s related to the weather. Perhaps a sunny day makes them happy, while a rainy day makes them sad. The weather is the “hidden” part of the story, and their mood is the “observable” part.

This simple puzzle is the essence of a Hidden Markov Model (HMM). HMMs are powerful statistical tools used to model systems where we can only observe a sequence of events, but the underlying process that generated them is hidden from view. They’ve found applications in everything from speech recognition and bioinformatics to finance and climatology.

This post will demystify HMMs, breaking down the core concepts, explaining the math in an accessible way, walking through a practical example, and finally, exploring their use in the dynamic world of time series analysis. By the end, you’ll understand not just what HMMs are, but how they can be used to uncover the secrets hidden in data.

The Core Idea: What Are We Hiding?

At its heart, an HMM is defined by two key components:

  1. Hidden States: These are the unobservable, underlying conditions of the system. In our weather example, the hidden states are Sunny and Rainy. We can’t see them directly, but we assume the system is always in one of these states at any given time.
  2. Observable Emissions: These are the events or data points we can actually see and measure. They are dependent on the hidden state. In our example, the observable emissions are your friend’s moods: Happy or Sad.

The “Markov” part of the name refers to a critical assumption: the Markov Property. This means that the probability of transitioning to a future hidden state depends only on the current hidden state, not on any of the states that came before it. In other words, today’s weather determines the probability of tomorrow’s weather, but the weather from last week is irrelevant. This simplifying assumption is what makes HMMs so computationally tractable and useful.

The Mathematical Engine: The Five Elements of an HMM

A Hidden Markov Model is completely defined by five essential elements, often represented as a tuple, $\lambda = (S, O, A, B, \pi)$, where:

  1. $S$ (State Space): A finite set of hidden states. For our example, $S = { \text{Sunny}, \text{Rainy} }$.

  2. $O$ (Observation Space): A finite set of possible observations. For our example, $O = { \text{Happy}, \text{Sad} }$.

  3. $A$ (Transition Probability Matrix): The “A” matrix defines the probability of moving from one hidden state to another. This is where the Markov property comes into play. If we have two states, Sunny (S) and Rainy (R), the matrix would look like this:

    From / ToSunny ($S$)Rainy ($R$)
    Sunny ($S$)$P(S|S)=0.8$$P(R|S)=0.2$
    Rainy ($R$)$P(S|R)=0.3$$P(R|R)=0.7$

    For instance, the probability of it being Sunny tomorrow, given that it’s Sunny today, is 0.8.

  4. $B$ (Emission Probability Matrix): The “B” matrix defines the probability of observing a particular emission from a given hidden state.

    State / EmissionHappy ($H$)Sad ($D$)
    Sunny ($S$)$P(H|S) = 0.9$$P(D|S) = 0.1$
    Rainy ($R$)$P(H|R) = 0.3$$P(D|R) = 0.7$

    This tells us that if the weather is Sunny, there is a 90% chance your friend will be Happy.

  5. $\pi$ (Initial State Probabilities): This vector represents the probability of the HMM starting in a particular hidden state. For example, we might assume the probability of the first day being Sunny is 0.6 and Rainy is 0.4.

    $\pi = { \pi_S = 0.6, \pi_R = 0.4 }$

With these five elements defined, we have fully specified a Hidden Markov Model.

Solving the Three Fundamental Problems

Once you’ve built an HMM, you’ll typically want to use it to answer some key questions. These are known as the three fundamental problems of HMMs.

Problem 1: Evaluation

Question: “Given a model and a sequence of observations, what is the probability that the model produced this sequence?”

Why it matters: This is a “scoring” problem. If we have two different HMMs, we can use this to figure out which one is a better fit for our observed data. For example, we could have one HMM for the weather on the East Coast and another for the West Coast. By feeding a sequence of moods to each model, we could determine which model (and therefore which climate) is more likely to have generated the data.

The Solution: The Forward Algorithm is the standard way to solve this. It efficiently calculates the total probability by summing up the probabilities of all possible hidden state paths that could have led to the observed sequence.

Problem 2: Decoding

Question: “Given a model and a sequence of observations, what is the most likely sequence of hidden states that produced this sequence?”

Why it matters: This is the “uncovering the hidden” problem. It’s the core of the HMM’s utility. If your friend has been Happy, then Happy, then Sad, this problem helps us determine the most likely underlying weather pattern (e.g., Sunny, then Sunny, then Rainy).

The Solution: The Viterbi Algorithm is the most common solution. Instead of summing probabilities like the forward algorithm, it finds the single path with the highest probability. It’s an elegant application of dynamic programming.

Problem 3: Learning

Question: “Given only a set of observation sequences, how do we find the best model parameters (the transition and emission probabilities)?”

Why it matters: This is arguably the most crucial problem for a data scientist. We usually don’t know the probabilities beforehand. We have to learn them from the data. For example, we might have a year’s worth of your friend’s moods and want to figure out the probabilities that govern the hidden weather system.

The Solution: The Baum-Welch algorithm (also known as the Forward-Backward algorithm) is a classic iterative approach. It starts with an initial guess for the probabilities and then repeatedly refines them to find a more optimal set of parameters that maximize the likelihood of the observed data.

HMMs in Practice: A Step-by-Step Example

Let’s put the concepts into action with a simplified numerical example.

Our HMM:

  • Hidden States: H = {Sunny, Rainy}
  • Observations: O = {Happy, Sad}
  • Initial Probabilities ($\pi$): P(Sunny) = 0.6, P(Rainy) = 0.4
  • Transition Probabilities ($A$):
    • P(Sunny | Sunny) = 0.8, P(Rainy | Sunny) = 0.2
    • P(Sunny | Rainy) = 0.3, P(Rainy | Rainy) = 0.7
  • Emission Probabilities ($B$):
    • P(Happy | Sunny) = 0.9, P(Sad | Sunny) = 0.1
    • P(Happy | Rainy) = 0.3, P(Sad | Rainy) = 0.7

The Problem: Your friend’s moods for the last three days were Happy, then Happy, then Sad. We want to find the total probability of this sequence.

Let’s use a simplified approach to illustrate the concept of the Forward Algorithm. We calculate the probability of the path at each step.

Step 1: Day 1 (Observation = Happy)

  • Probability of starting in a Sunny state AND observing Happy: $P(\text{Sunny, Happy}) = P(\text{Sunny}) \times P(\text{Happy | Sunny}) = 0.6 \times 0.9 = 0.54$
  • Probability of starting in a Rainy state AND observing Happy: $P(\text{Rainy, Happy}) = P(\text{Rainy}) \times P(\text{Happy | Rainy}) = 0.4 \times 0.3 = 0.12$

The total probability of observing “Happy” on Day 1 is $0.54 + 0.12 = 0.66$.

Step 2: Day 2 (Observation = Happy) Now we need to consider all possible paths from Day 1 to Day 2.

  • Path A: Sunny -> Sunny -> Happy $P(\text{Path A}) = P(\text{Sunny on Day 1}) \times P(\text{Happy | Sunny}) \times P(\text{Sunny | Sunny}) \times P(\text{Happy | Sunny})$ $P(\text{Path A}) = 0.6 \times 0.9 \times 0.8 \times 0.9 = 0.3888$
  • Path B: Rainy -> Sunny -> Happy $P(\text{Path B}) = P(\text{Rainy on Day 1}) \times P(\text{Happy | Rainy}) \times P(\text{Sunny | Rainy}) \times P(\text{Happy | Sunny})$ $P(\text{Path B}) = 0.4 \times 0.3 \times 0.3 \times 0.9 = 0.0324$
  • Path C: Sunny -> Rainy -> Happy $P(\text{Path C}) = P(\text{Sunny on Day 1}) \times P(\text{Happy | Sunny}) \times P(\text{Rainy | Sunny}) \times P(\text{Happy | Rainy})$ $P(\text{Path C}) = 0.6 \times 0.9 \times 0.2 \times 0.3 = 0.0324$
  • Path D: Rainy -> Rainy -> Happy $P(\text{Path D}) = P(\text{Rainy on Day 1}) \times P(\text{Happy | Rainy}) \times P(\text{Rainy | Rainy}) \times P(\text{Happy | Rainy})$ $P(\text{Path D}) = 0.4 \times 0.3 \times 0.7 \times 0.3 = 0.0252$

The total probability of observing “Happy, Happy” is the sum of all these path probabilities: $0.3888 + 0.0324 + 0.0324 + 0.0252 = 0.4788$.

As you can see, this gets complicated quickly. For just three days, we have $2^3 = 8$ total paths. The Forward algorithm cleverly sums these probabilities at each step, making the calculation much more efficient than enumerating every possible path.

HMMs for Time Series Analysis: Detecting Regimes

One of the most powerful applications of HMMs is in time series analysis, particularly in a field known as regime detection. A regime is a distinct pattern of behavior that a system or series of data exhibits. For example, in financial markets, you might have “bull market” regimes (high returns, low volatility), “bear market” regimes (negative returns, high volatility), and “stagnant” or “range-bound” regimes.

Traditional time series models like ARIMA (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average) and GARCH (Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity) are great at capturing trends and volatility in a single regime. However, they assume the underlying process is stable over time, which is often not true. This is where HMMs excel.

How it works:

  • Hidden States: The hidden states of the HMM become the different regimes we want to detect. For example, State 1 = Bear Market, State 2 = Sideways Market, State 3 = Bull Market.
  • Observations: The observable data are the time series itself, such as daily stock returns or volatility.

The HMM can then be trained on historical market data. It uses the Baum-Welch algorithm (Problem 3) to learn the transition probabilities between regimes (e.g., the probability of a bull market transitioning to a bear market) and the emission probabilities (e.g., the probability of a specific return given a bear market regime).

Once the model is trained, we can apply the Viterbi Algorithm (Problem 2) to a new sequence of market returns. The HMM will then “decode” the most likely sequence of market regimes that occurred. This gives us a powerful tool to identify when the market’s behavior has fundamentally shifted, which can be critical for risk management and trading strategies.

HMMs vs. Other Time Series Models

So, when should you choose an HMM over other popular models?

FeatureHidden Markov Model (HMM)ARIMA/GARCHRNNs (Recurrent Neural Networks)
Core AssumptionData is generated by an underlying, unobserved process with distinct states.The data-generating process is stationary or can be made so.Learns complex, non-linear dependencies in the data.
Best Use CaseRegime detection and modeling systems with discrete “states” or “modes.” Speech recognition, bioinformatics, and regime-switching in finance.Forecasting stationary time series. Great for capturing autocorrelation and volatility clustering within a single regime.High-dimensional, complex sequential data where the past matters a lot. Natural Language Processing, text generation, and sophisticated time series forecasting.
StrengthsCan capture abrupt structural changes and “regime switches.” Intuitive and interpretable. Performs well on smaller datasets.Interpretable parameters. Mathematically well-understood. Excellent for standard forecasting tasks.Can capture long-term dependencies. Very powerful for complex patterns. State-of-the-art for many tasks.
WeaknessesCan be too simplistic for complex, non-linear relationships. Assumes the Markov property holds.Cannot capture structural breaks or regime shifts. Assumes a single data-generating process.Computationally expensive. Requires large datasets. Often a “black box” and hard to interpret.

As the table shows, HMMs fill a unique niche in the data scientist’s toolkit. They are perfect for problems where you believe there are a few distinct, hidden processes or “states” that drive the behavior of the data you observe.

Conclusion

Hidden Markov Models are an elegant and intuitive approach to modeling sequential data. By making a simple assumption about the nature of a hidden system, they provide a powerful framework for solving three critical problems: evaluating the likelihood of a sequence, decoding the hidden states that generated it, and learning the model’s parameters from data.

From identifying distinct market regimes to predicting the structure of a protein, HMMs allow us to peer behind the curtain of our observable reality and gain a deeper understanding of the processes that shape our world. While newer, more complex models like RNNs have emerged, the HMM remains a foundational and highly practical tool for any data scientist or statistician seeking to make sense of the unseen.

Sources Cited: